November 10 2017

Lest We Forget

A minute to reflect

This weekend we will pause to reflect on those who paid the ultimate sacrifice in defence of our great nation. The image often conjured to help us focus our minds is of a lone tommy, head bowed as he leans heavily on his Lee Enfield rifle. We consider the men–and women who made those sacrifices, losing life or limb so we may live our lives in peace. But as we pause, silent for the obligatory minute, let us consider these two questions:

Is our ‘great’ nation truly one to be proud of? And do we really live in peace?


A word of warning: you may prefer to use today to simply salute the many lone tommies and reflect on their dedication. If this is so, and if you’d rather not cloud the picture with thoughts of why we as a nation continue to expect them to pay the high price to support our government’s military agendas, quit now. You may not like what follows.

Contradictions abound

Clues to the two questions posed above, the answers to which become ever urgent with each passing day, may be obtained if we use the minute’s silence to examine our nation’s wars in a twenty-first century context. For example, when was the last time our troops lost their lives in defence of Britain and its values? Much is made of our defence budget, and its importance in protecting our shores, but the term is a misnomer–a fallacy.

Since 2001 our forces have been used in a series of illegal, offensive wars of conquest and regime change with the sole aim of furthering Anglo-American geo-political ambitions across the Middle East. These aims were amply demonstrated in the American neo-conservative document–Project for the New American Century–produced in 2000. The group’s overarching aim was to:

‘… shape a new century favourable to American principles and interests.’ [Together with challenging] ‘… regimes hostile to U.S. interest and values.’

These ‘hostile regimes’ were clearly reflected in a 2007 statement made by US General Wesley Clark:


Among the PNAC document’s unambiguous declarations were:

To preserve [global Pax Americana] — ‘American peace’ through the 21st century, the PNAC report concludes that the global order ‘must have a secure foundation on unquestioned U.S. military preeminence.’

It also stated:

The process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor.

This ‘catastrophic and catalyzing’ event occurred only a year after the document’s publication — on September 11th, 2001. This was the green light America and her allies needed to enact their pre-emptive wars on nations that posed no threat to the West–wars that were therefore illegal.

It may interest you to know that one of the key authors of this document–Philip Zelikow–is also the man who gave us the official account of 9/11, the ultimate in bizarre conspiracy theories that is an affront to every human being with a modicum of intelligence.

But what of the consequences of the ensuing pre-emptive actions, and where do they fit in the context of our own Remembrance Sunday?

Pawns lost to the game

Between 2001 and 2015, 456 British military personnel lost their lives in Afghanistan. A further 179 died between 2003 and 2009 in Iraq.

This is a tragedy outweighed many times over by the 200,000+ innocent civilians who were victims of our nations’ actions. Innocent civilians who died in your name; my name. Civilians whose only crime was to live in an area of strategic importance to the West and its energy needs.

What of the tens of thousands of men, women and children who continue to suffer from our military’s illegal use of depleted uranium warheads? The many babies who continue to be born with horrific, painful deformities. And what of the crippling distress that has resulted from the West’s inhumane sanctions and the consequential devastating regional instability? If you have compassion you’ll spare a thought for these people, too.

Ultimate sacrifice

So, on November 11 we consider the sacrifices made by our military personnel. But sacrifices are not restricted to life, limb and time lost with loved ones. Peace of mind is forfeit, too.

Why, since 2001, have more servicemen died as a result of suicide than the number lost in battle? Whilst many will no doubt have been traumatised by the loss of comrades on the front lines, how many have been sickened by the nature of their undertaking–to fight an illegal war against innocents in order to satisfy the greed of multi-billion dollar corporations? Corporations who’re the real drivers behind our so-called democracies and who prowl the battlefield’s edges, waiting to capitalise on the resulting destruction.

In sending our forces onto the field under such circumstances, we not only demand their loyalty and discipline, we ask them to put aside their compassion–their moral compass; to ignore the insistent voice of conscience in support of their corrupt, duplicitous governments.

Consenting lambs

Consider this: neither the US nor the UK imposes conscription to fill the ranks of their military. All combatants are willing volunteers.

With that thought in mind, allow me to close with lines from ‘Universal Soldier‘ by Buffy Sainte-Marie, a Canadian singer/songwriter of Native-American parentage.

No doubt her heritage gave her a unique perspective to write so eloquently of the futility of war and the suffering caused by military action.

He’s five feet two and he’s six feet four
He fights with missiles and with spears
He’s all of 31 and he’s only 17
He’s been a soldier for a thousand years

He’s a Catholic, a Hindu, an athiest, a Jain,
a Buddhist and a Baptist and a Jew
and he knows he shouldn’t kill
and he knows he always will
kill you for me my friend and me for you

And he’s fighting for Canada,
he’s fighting for France,
he’s fighting for the USA,
and he’s fighting for the Russians
and he’s fighting for Japan,
and he thinks we’ll put an end to war this way

And he’s fighting for Democracy
and fighting for the Reds
He says it’s for the peace of all
He’s the one who must decide
who’s to live and who’s to die
and he never sees the writing on the walls

But without him how would Hitler have
condemned him at Dachau
Without him Caesar would have stood alone
He’s the one who gives his body
as a weapon to a war
and without him all this killing can’t go on

He’s the universal soldier and he
really is to blame
His orders come from far away no more
They come from him, and you, and me
and brothers can’t you see
this is not the way we put an end to war


September 12 2017



Mass Murder & the American Dream

It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously.

Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation.

For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.

These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.

Adolf Hitler – Mein Kampf

An End to Complacency

Last week I risked disdain by adding a post here entitled Nine-Eleven: More Monstrous than Cthulhu

The post was quite timely given that this month sees the sixteenth anniversary of that dreadful Tuesday when three towers of the World Trade Centre collapsed and the world changed forever.

Did I say timely? Perhaps not. Like many people, including the current US president, I suspected that something was seriously amiss that day, yet I’ve allowed sixteen years of complacency to lapse before speaking out.

Enough of that—now is the time to add my voice to the increasing millions demanding an investigation into the events surrounding 9-11 and for the real perpetrators to be held accountable.

Make no mistake, those demanding justice are not confined to spotty, bearded conspiracy theorists weaned on endless reruns of The X Files. Instead, they include intelligent professionals who have a personal stake in the findings of an accurate and impartial investigation.

They include:

Architects and Engineers, men and women responsible for the design and construction of high rise buildings and who need to know why tower blocks failed to survive those incidents they’d been designed to endure.

Firefighters whose procedure for fighting fires in high rise buildings—that of forming a position on the floor beneath the fire from which to attack the flames—is rendered unsuitable, based on the towers’ collapse.

Airline pilots who’re aware it would have been impossible for inexperienced hijackers to have flown the Boeing 767s into the towers due to the immense stresses placed on civil aircraft flying fast at low altitudes, and the handling difficulties this would have caused. Using flight simulators, qualified pilots with thousands of hours flying time have been unable to replicate such manoeuvres with the same degree of accuracy.

The list goes on and includes the likes of lawyers, scholars and other professional bodies, not just in America but worldwide.

Come on, guys, who’re you kidding?
Master of ‘false flag’ covert operations

Join the Dots

Once you seek the truth you become presented with an array of undeniable facts. Each fact is a dot in a confused image.

The true culprits don’t fear this information being available to you. Instead, they’re only too aware that the mass of data can be smoke and mirrors hiding the realities of 9-11.

What they don’t want, however—and what they fear most of all—is for you to join those dots. For only then will you be presented with a picture so immoral and horrific it will take your breath away.


Blinded by Decency

In view of the overwhelming and irrefutable information that supports allegations of an ‘inside job’ and government conspiracy, why would one such as I suffer disdain by speaking out?

One reason is that the implications of such accusations are too monstrous for decent, law-abiding citizens to consider. So outrageous in fact that many prefer not to seek out the evidence that sits in plain sight for those willing to look.

Another cause is utter helplessness: ‘So what if it’s true? What can we do?’

The answer to that one is ‘nothing’—alone. But the adage ‘strength in unity’ holds fast here, too. And consider this: of the immense wealth at the perpetrators’ disposal, and the resources and apparatus that wealth affords them, their main weapons cost them nothing—for those weapons are your common decency and your sense of helplessness.

Is it so difficult to imagine state-sponsored mass murder? We only need to look to Nazi Germany of 1939 to 1945 to discover one example. Whilst I make no comparisons, here we have another instance of state-engineered murder conducted to achieve political ambitions.

And here’s the irony: Evidence of the Nazi atrocities is incontestable and any who refuse to accept the facts are branded ‘holocaust deniers’ and quite rightly ostracised. On the other hand, those who view 9-11’s equally damning evidence as confirmation of a government plot are considered ‘conspiracy theorists’. Such is the power of a state-controlled media.

Did I say state controlled? What other explanation accounts for the fact that the UK’s flagship ‘impartial’ media organisation, the BBC, announced the collapse of WTC-7 twenty-three minutes before the event?

If we are to finally bring those guilty of the 9-11 murders to account, it’s time to add the weight of our combined voices to those of the professionals listed above, not just in the USA or Britain, but worldwide. In view of the hideous chain of events that have occurred since September 2001, the consequences of inaction now would be dire.

CSI Ground Zero

Leaving the why and the how aside for the moment, if you still have doubts that the US government was responsible for the events of that tragic Tuesday, let us agree on this: whether it was the result of terrorist action or government conspiracy, Ground Zero represented a massive crime scene.

Ground Zero Crime Scene

As we know, when a crime has been committed, all efforts are made to preserve the integrity of the scene to ensure accurate and untainted forensic evidence is compiled allowing for a full investigation to occur.

Yet in the immediate aftermath of 9-11, and while George W Bush was delaying the implementation of an enquiry, fleets of trucks—up to four hundred per day—were used to systematically remove this evidence. Rather than cart it to a safe location for further analysis, however, it was shipped to China for ‘recycling’.

So, whether you consider 9-11 to be the result of terrorism or government conspiracy, this destruction of vital crime scene evidence following the murder of almost three thousand innocent civilians itself constituted a crime of staggering proportions—a crime for which the ‘hijackers’ could not have been held responsible, despite the other miracles that we’re given to believe occurred that day.

A Recycled Idea

Operation Northwoods US military strategy, 1962 style

While you still struggle with the possibility that 9-11 may have been engineered to cause fear among the American people, curb their civil rights and achieve predetermined military and political objectives, consider Operation Northwoods, a plan drawn up in 1962 and signed by Chief of Staff, Lyman Lemnitzer.

Proposed treason, 1962 Given a hero’s burial, 1988

The treasonous proposal to hijack airplanes and conduct acts of terrorism against US civilians and military targets to justify a war against Cuba was vehemently rejected by John F Kennedy.

Of those two named individuals, one was later assassinated in Dallas in 1963, and the other promoted to become NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander and, after his death in 1988, afforded a heroes’ burial in Washington’s Arlington Cemetery.

I leave you to draw your own conclusions.

John F Kennedy
Opposed Northwoods, 1962
Murdered, 1963

A Marriage made in Hell

I’m British. Several weeks ago, I would have declared ‘I’m British and intensely proud of that fact,’ but no more.

Whilst it would be easy for me to sit here atop a perceived moral high ground and glare scornfully across the Atlantic to our cousins seduced by the purity of their flag, recent events have shattered my illusions and left me wondering about our own government’s culpability in American ambitions for ‘A New World Order’.

It is common knowledge that Saudi Arabia has long been the wellspring for such as ISIS and the radicalisation of UK Muslims. In fact, despite previously negotiating arms deals worth billions with the Saudis, our own government commissioned a report into their terrorist activities. A report that, despite recent pleas made by 9-11 survivors, requesting Theresa May to reveal the contents and so shed light on the truth of 9-11, remains top-secret under the age-old pretext of ‘national security’.

Does this make you feel secure? Who are the government really protecting? Equally importantly, why?

While we continue to support our US allies, ponder this:

At the end of the second world war, when Europe lay in ruins, America was forced to look elsewhere if it was to pursue its aims of perpetual war.  Its eyes turned on Asia resulting in its wars in Korea and Vietnam. More recently, the Middle East has entered American cross-hairs.

Who will be their next target as they continue to strive for world domination, dragging their compliant allies behind them?

Blatant Hypocrisy at the Cenotaph

On November 11 we will once again remember our fallen heroes. We’ll watch as our politicians line up at the cenotaph—politicians who continue to send our servicemen and women in support of the US’s self-engineered ‘war on terror’. There, wearing their dark suits and pious solemnity, they’ll lay their wreaths.

But what of those whose names adorn the memorial; those who paid the ultimate price to defend Britain? What value do you think they would place on their sacrifice if they could see what this nation had become in their absence?

What luck for rulers that men do not think.

Adolf Hitler – Mein Kampf


September 5 2017

Nine-Eleven: More Monstrous than Cthulhu?




It is a mistake to fancy that horror is associated inextricably with darkness, silence and solitude.

H.P Lovecraft, Cool Air—1928

A shadow out of time

Howard Phillips Lovecraft was an American horror writer of the 20s and 30s. Within his remarkable and enduring fiction he gave us ‘The Cthulhu Mythos’ — providing a common plot theme that ran through much of his writing.

In brief, the mythos’ basic premise was that Earth was under threat from hidden, secretive entities — demonic god-like creatures which, while being immensely powerful were virtually impotent without the aid of legions of compliant acolytes willing to do the creatures’ bidding, even though by so doing they risked mankind’s very existence.

The reasons for this literary analogy will become apparent as you read on.

Horror of horrors

For many years I’ve been a fan of horror, both fiction and movies. Of the two, I tend to prefer fiction. The human mind has far greater capacity to imagine nightmarish scenes and to sense deeper outrage at barbarous atrocities and their consequences than even the best A-list actors backed by state of the art CGI can ever trigger through visual media. Film tends to fall short, failing to shock to the same degree.

Recently, however, I viewed a film that has so appalled me it created a feeling of such utter violation and triggered so deep-seated a fear for the future that several sleepless nights have ensued. Rather than protect you from experiencing the same discontent by warning you to avoid this film, I urge you to watch it.

The film concerns the events that occurred on 11th September, 2001. An event we now refer to as 9-11, as though the use of a bland tagline can ever serve to diminish the horrors of that day.

Painful viewing

Before you cry ‘conspiracy theory’ and dismiss what follows, consider that, while some conspiracy theories do indeed border on the bizarre, once the point is reached when sufficient evidence is presented that proves beyond any reasonable doubt that a conspiracy does in fact exist, it’s no longer a theory. What remains should then be the springboard for further investigation into the truth—a truth from which you have hitherto been denied.

The day the world changed

Nine-eleven set in motion such a cataclysmic chain of events that the world we now live in is almost unrecognisable to that of 2001. Now in 2017, as those in power look to North Korea and the evening news once again bears a sadly familiar yet deeply unsettling melody, I believe it’s time we woke up to the realities of what, in September 1991, George Bush senior referred to as his vision for ‘A New World Order’.

The film I urge you to watch is ‘9-11 Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out’ and is freely available on YouTube. Here’s the link:

What you have here is a collection of multi-disciplined experts—architects and engineers, explosive and demolition specialists—all presenting irrefutable evidence that the destruction of three World Trade Centre (WTC) buildings was the result of controlled demolition and not the result of a terrorist attack.

There’s not one spotty nerd crying ‘conspiracy’ among them.

These are men and women—all of whom have a vested professional interest in understanding the truth of that day—and who are willing to step up to the plate, lay their reputations on the line, present evidence and demand a full explanation of what really happened.

They include architects responsible for the design of high-rise buildings. Given that WTC 1 and 2 were buildings designed to withstand aircraft strikes and fire yet failed to remain intact under those very conditions, these people need to know why—as indeed should governments worldwide who also have tower blocks in their domains.

Click the link for more information

Look again — more closely

Rather than catalogue the film’s contents, I’ll leave you to view it yourself. But I urge you, watch the footage—yes, I know, we’ve seen it countless times. This time, watch it objectively, and with an inquisitive open mind. As you do, ask yourself:

  1. How did apparently oxygen-starved low temperature flames so irreversibly undermine the buildings’ steel support structures? Even had the aircrafts’ fuel not been instantly consumed by the initial fireballs (which it had), it would not attain sufficient temperature to melt steel. To believe this is to suggest that the fuel in a kerosene lamp burns at sufficient temperature to undermine the metal of the lamp itself. Nonsense.
  2. Given that the flames could NOT melt steel. What caused molten steel to pour down the sides of the buildings prior to their collapse?
  3. The NIST report suggested the upper floors of the buildings collapsed, causing a ‘pancake effect’, crushing the floors beneath. If this were so, the mass of the lower structure would provide resistance to the weight bearing down from above. Yet all three WTC buildings collapsed at free-fall speeds into their own footprints. For free-fall speeds to be attained, lower support integrity must be removed prior to the load impact from above. This can only be achieved through controlled demolition.
  4. What causes the series of explosions visible beneath the collapsing structure, running down in sequence during the collapse? Explosions that were heard by those present and can be heard in numerous video clips.

These are just a few of the many questions raised by the event and the misleading report that followed.

Of the many high-rise buildings worldwide that have experienced catastrophic fires, only three have collapsed as a result: WTC 1, 2 and 7. Some high-rise buildings have collapsed due to natural disasters. However, of all high-rise collapses, only three have dropped into their own footprint: WTC 1, 2 and 7.

World Trade Center 7: 9-11’s ‘Smoking Gun’

Often forgotten, yet referred to in the film as ‘The Smoking Gun’, World Trade Centre 7 was a 47-storey building that had not been struck by anything but debris from WTC 1 and 2, yet it collapsed at 5:20 that afternoon. In doing so it posed a whole new set of questions.

Further questions are raised when we look at the ‘attack’ on the Pentagon.

Impregnable fortress of ‘the free world’?

At that time, the Pentagon was protected by four military airbases and a ring of ground to air missile batteries. Yet on 9-11 we were told it had been struck by a hostile aircraft without triggering any defence of any kind.

We were later led to believe that the perpetrators were Muslim terrorists who had attained only a few hours flying lessons in small turbo-prop aircraft, yet were able to pilot the large, civil airliner, straight and true on an extensive low-level trajectory into the side of the most heavily defended building on the planet. Furthermore, it did so without leaving any evidence of passengers nor their luggage.

The Pentagon, 9/11/2001: Where were the passengers? Their luggage? The ‘plane?
Lockerbie – Pan Am 103: Widespread wreckage








If these doubts, together with the realities of metallurgy and the law of physics fail to stimulate you, perhaps the question below will prompt thought. The question has been asked numerous times in the media but perhaps you may have never considered it.


‘The Pet Goat’ mystery

A word in your ear …

On the morning of 9-11, George W. Bush was attending Booker Elementary School in Florida. We saw on the evening news how at 09:05 his aid informed him of the second strike as he was being read ‘The Pet Goat‘.

Official accounts indicate that, at that time, more hostile aircraft were suspected of being airborne — perhaps as many as eleven — yet despite the President’s itinerary having been common knowledge for four days, rather than whisk the US Commander-in-Chief to safety, the secret service staff remained waiting in the wings for a further twenty minutes. Why was this? Did Bush and his entourage know perhaps that they were safe?

Since 2001, the internet, our bookstores and libraries have become awash with an ever-increasing tide of media from individuals scandalised by the events of 9-11. As with our experts above, the authors are intelligent, patriotic individuals deserving a true explanation of the events, as indeed do the families of the thousands of victims from that day. Yet, despite the increasing noise from outraged individuals, the US government remains tight-lipped.

Evidence of an ‘inside job’

Overwhelming and irrefutable evidence now supports claims that the buildings’ collapse—indeed the events of 9-11 in general­—were the result of an ‘inside job’ rather than being committed by foreign agencies. But why? And by who?

These are questions that must be urgently answered before we allow the world to continue its spiral toward self-destruction, a demise that appears to be orchestrated by an elite few. A hidden elite whose power and wealth places them above the laws that govern the rest of us, and which provides them the leverage to mastermind and manipulate world events to meet their own hidden agendas.

Bush’s ‘New World Order’?

When considering the reality of 9-11, it is the consequences of that day that create such profound disquiet among those unwilling to accept the ‘official line’. What follows is an incomplete summary, but the cost of 9-11 includes:

  1. The war on terror, ensuing government sponsored fear and the US’s draconian Patriot Act.
  2. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
  3. Ensuing middle-east instability.
  4. The Syrian civil war.
  5. Consequential mass migration to Europe.
  6. Demonisation of Muslims worldwide.
  7. Significant increase in radicalisation and resulting terrorist attacks on European cities.
  8. Millions of lives lost; countless others ruined.

As I said, this list is incomplete but should be sufficient for any free-thinking world citizen to cry ‘enough’. For in summary, the legacy of 9-11 represents the most fundamental threat to world stability and international security facing us today.

Left unchecked and driven by the warped ambitions of a chosen few, world events will—like the WTC buildings themselves—free-fall toward our widespread destruction.

Time to start listening

Pandora’s box

It has already been suggested by many observers that this ‘secret government’ within the US may have been manipulating world events from as early as 1918. Here we may be stepping into ‘conspiracy theory’ but given the above facts, it is worth looking back at a potted history of the twentieth century considering what we now suspect:

  • The first world war — the first ever ‘total war’ requiring mass mobilisation of industry toward the war effort — was a money-spinner on a vast scale for US industrialists. This windfall ceased with the armistice in 1918.
  • During the 1930’s Hitler came to power in a bankrupt Germany yet was bankrolled sufficiently to embark on vast building and military expansion projects, resulting in world war two.
  • By 1945 Europe lay in ruins and Germany was no longer a threat. Communism was on the rise, its eyes directed toward Asia.
  • The Korean war.
  • Assassination of JFK after he swore to oppose ‘secret societies’ and promised to prevent an American conflict with Vietnam.
  • The Vietnam war, netting further billions for US industries.
  • 9-11 and the ensuing events already listed above.

State-sponsored ‘perpetual war’

In George Orwell’s novel 1984, the author writes of a fictitious government that launches attacks against its own people to perpetuate fear and hatred of the enemy. Therefore, he surmises, perpetual war may be a secret state strategy to continuously further its own political agenda. Food for thought, don’t you think? Fiction often provides an insight into reality.

Pain avoidance

This post is the culmination of research I’ve undertaken driven by doubts I first had in 2001 when witnessing the shocking events in New York. Information is there for those willing to find it. Once realisation dawns, however, its implications create such levels of apprehension it explains why many, already traumatised by those events, choose to avoid greater anguish by ignoring the truth.

Perhaps it’s time to try

I opened with a quote by horror writer H.P. Lovecraft. I’ll close with a prophetic statement he included in his story ‘The Call of Cthulhu’ in 1928:

The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. We live on a placid island of ignorance in the midst of black seas of infinity, and it was not meant that we should voyage far. The sciences, each straining in its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little; but some day the piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.